FIP and xERA Are Comparable Predictors

Something I’ve been asking myself this year (and the abyss, as I’ve mentioned it in posts) is whether FIP or xERA is more predictive, as xERA enters more into the…well, I would’ve said mainstream, but we’re a ways from that already, so let’s say the FanGraphs sphere. With xERA in FanGraphs, it’s more accessible than ever, and more available for my personal usage than ever, and yet I still tend to use FIP as a better indicator of a pitcher’s true performance level, not knowing whether it or xERA is the better predictor between the two.

I realized recently it would be fairly easy to check, so I checked, and while the dive I did was rather quick, and therefore not exactly comprehensive, it was helpful. From 2015, for which xERA is first available, through 2019, I took every qualifying pitcher’s xERA, ERA, and FIP, and ran some regressions between them. Specifically, I asked how well each of those three metrics predicted a pitcher’s ERA the next year, something that, because it required pitchers to hit the qualifying innings threshold two years in a row, limited the sample size to 126.

Here’s how the r-squared values came out:

Variable 1Variable 2R-Squared
ERANxt Yr ERA0.061569
xERANxt Yr ERA0.174174
FIPNxt Yr ERA0.178954

Again, 126 isn’t the biggest sample size, but the early indicator is that FIP and xERA are comparable predictors of a pitcher’s ERA the next season, while ERA is noisy enough to not be its own best predictor (as we already knew, to an extent). Out of curiosity, I also compared FIP to next-year-FIP and xERA to next-year-xERA, reaching the following r-squareds:

Variable 1Variable 2R-Squared
FIPNxt Yr FIP0.239168
xERANxt Yr xERA0.26545

Again, so close that it’s hard to say, but it’s interesting that xERA at least might be more predictive of xERA than FIP is of FIP going across seasons. A deeper dive would probably involve expanding the innings thresholds or trying to compare across different time intervals than season-to-season, but those would bring with them their own flaws. For the moment, it’s probably safe to use either FIP or xERA, or to use the two in conjunction, and to look forward to getting more full-season data again at the end of September 2022, when we’re finally comparing consecutive 162-game seasons to one another again.

The Barking Crow's resident numbers man. Was asked to do NIT Bracketology in 2018 and never looked back. Fields inquiries on Twitter: @joestunardi.
Posts created 3299

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.