Editor’s Note: For almost two years now, Joe has been publishing picks here and back at All Things NIT, our former site. There have been moments of greatness (the Nationals winning the World Series last year, the first two months of last college basketball season). There have been moments of frustration (the second two months of last college basketball season). Overall, the results have been positive, with an average return on investment, per pick, of 6% when weighting by confidence (1 for low, 2 for medium, 3 for high) across 1,008 published picks, not including pending futures. And while 6% might not be a great annual return on overall investments, if you strategize well with timing, you can turn daily 6%’s into a whole lot more than 6% over the course of a year.
Use these picks at your own risk. Only you are responsible for any money you lose, and you should not bet more than you can afford to lose. If you have a gambling problem, get help.
Lines for these come from the Vegas Consensus or the closest approximation available at the time picks are written, unless otherwise noted. The blurbs aren’t always explanations of the picks—sometimes they are, but often they’re just notes related to the contest, to avoid redundancy. Data and predictions from FanGraphs is heavily used in making MLB picks. Data from Baseball Savant and ESPN is also often used.
Just futures today, and as always with futures here, odds come from Bovada rather than a Vegas Consensus.
Futures
The AL Central race changes by the day, which can lead to what are effectively arbitrage opportunities. Of course, the risk is that you dig too deep a whole, but we’re a long ways from being that invested. As it stands, there’s value to be had on both these plays as the pendulum’s swung back towards overvaluing the White Sox (and Tigers).
Pick: Cleveland to win AL Central +160. Low confidence.
Pick: Minnesota to win ALCS +800. Low confidence.