NIT Bracketology: Friday, February 23rd

Our college basketball model is live now, in its full and final form. If you’re interested in how it works, you can read about that here. If you’re looking for NIT Bracketology or our model’s estimation of each team’s probability of making/winning the NIT, we have those things for you as well.

A quick note, before we get into the First Four Out and the rest:

As we converted our model from the medium version to the full version, we found an error in the medium version we hadn’t previously noticed. Its variable for how much season was remaining was flipped. Rather than saying, on Monday, that 22% of the season remained, it thought 78% of the season remained. This created some inaccuracies in our bracketologies, and it was only getting worse over time. Thankfully, not too many teams were too dramatically affected, but if your team inexplicably moved between Monday’s bracketology and today’s, there are two possible explanations: One is that their real schedule, which our full model considers, is more or less advantageous than the average schedule our medium model was working with. The other is that the very stupid glitch we created in the medium model was pulling your team in an inaccurate direction. Our apologies if you were affected by this. We messed up.

We should be in better shape from here on out. It wouldn’t surprise me if our full model has a few bugs (we typed the final code a little after midnight last night, while Washington State was doing magical things in Tucson), and our model has its natural shortcomings, but we’ll communicate about all that as it stands. Today’s NIT Bracketology is our best prediction of the eventual NIT field. Let’s get into it.

First Four In, Last Four Out, Etc.

On the low side:

  • Last Four In (from the cut line going upwards): NC State, Yale, VCU, George Mason
  • First Four Out (from the cut line going downwards): Florida State, Cornell, South Florida, Georgia
  • Others in the mix (>10% NIT chance, below NIT field, not in our field or in the First Four Out): UCF, Rutgers, UMass, Boston College, Miami (FL), UNLV, Loyola (IL), St. Bonaventure, North Texas, Duquesne

On the high side:

  • Last Four In (from the cut line going downwards): Utah, Providence, Drake, Mississippi
  • First Four Out (from the cut line going upwards): Texas A&M, Virginia, Gonzaga, Villanova

Indiana State, Princeton, and Other Conference Tournament Favorites

One thing we were surprised by when we ran our model was how low it placed the expected NIT cut line. We thought it would be at 80th in the mythical master seed list. It’s at 82nd. This is a small distinction, but it makes a difference. There are more at-large spots available than we expected. Part of this is that some of the NCAAT bid thieves our model expects come from the NIT at-large field. Part of it is that certain conference tournament favorites who lose their conference tournaments will likely fall out of the NIT as a result of the specific loss. The only conference tournament favorite we put into today’s field (something we do to keep that cut line accurate) is Princeton. Indiana State, Grand Canyon, and James Madison all have a good NIT chance if they lose their conference tournament, though, and McNeese, Samford, and UC Irvine are also in that mix.

The Favorites

We have those probabilities now, so for the sake of fun…

The ten likeliest teams to make the NIT:

  • Pitt: 87.9%
  • St. John’s: 85.2%
  • Syracuse: 83.7%
  • Oregon: 82.4%
  • Xavier: 80.6%
  • Ohio State: 78.6%
  • Iowa: 78.4%
  • Washington: 75.4%
  • Virginia Tech: 74.6%
  • Cincinnati: 74.1%

None of these teams are guaranteed to make the NIT—we expect eight to make it and two to miss it, per those probabilities—but these are the ten NIT-likeliest. Syracuse? Mea culpa for our previous doubt. Mea maxima culpa.

The ten likeliest teams to win the NIT:

  • Colorado: 6.2%
  • SMU: 5.5%
  • Cincinnati: 4.6%
  • St. John’s: 4.3%
  • Wake Forest: 4.1%
  • Gonzaga: 4.1%
  • Villanova: 3.6%
  • Xavier: 3.4%
  • Virginia Tech: 3.2%
  • Iowa: 3.1%

These are some low, low, low probabilities. There’s a 58% chance one of these ten teams doesn’t win the NIT. With the NCAA Tournament, there’s only a 23% chance a non-top-ten contender wins it. Thanks to a confluence of factors—how tightly packed the bubble always is and the elimination of the previous NIT automatic bid system, to name the biggest two—the NIT should be expected to be extremely competitive. That’s on paper, too. In the real world, the chaos factor can be expected to be even larger. (We don’t know if Cody Williams will or won’t play if Colorado makes the NIT.)

Also notably, three of the teams on this list are less than 40% likely to make the NIT, and Wake and Gonzaga are each less than 30% likely to make it. If you’re setting a futures market for this, let us at it. We will probably lose money to you. This is a wacky list.

Where We’re an Outlier

We mentioned this elsewhere, but we’re going to be using our NCAAT seed list to do some subjective bracketology in addition to the objective bracketology our model pumps out. We won’t start that for a little while—the bubble’s contours are still taking shape—but in that sort of vein, here’s where our model differs most from Bracket Matrix (on the NCAAT side) and John Templon’s NIT Bracketology (on the NIT side), and what we think about the big disagreements:

Gonzaga: Bracket Matrix 11-seed, The Barking Crow 8-seed

We aren’t sure this is really a disagreement. Gonzaga’s our third team out of the NIT on the high side. We’re assigning them a 2-in-7 chance of missing the NCAA Tournament. What’s happening, we think, is that because Gonzaga’s on the bubble, most bracketologies are placing them as an 11-seed now and will change that closer to the tournament, when they start looking at how the committee will actually seed the teams in question. The committee seeds differently than it selects. Gonzaga should seed rather well, provided it does stay above the cut line.

Wake Forest: Bracket Matrix First Four Out, The Barking Crow 9-seed

Again, we aren’t sure this is a disagreement. We’re predicting Wake Forest will pick up some Q1 wins in what’s looking like three chances down the stretch (plus quite possibly more in the ACC Tournament). We’re guessing most bracketologists would agree if their methods were forward-looking like ours. Not that they should be. Predictive vs. Reflective is a matter of preference. But this far out from Selection Sunday, the difference creates some odd optics. Wake should get it done. Whether they do or don’t, I’d guess our model and the consensus will form at least a loose agreement when the rest of the cake gets baked.

Villanova: Bracket Matrix Next Four Out, The Barking Crow 10-seed

As with Wake, Villanova has good chances remaining to fix its team sheet. Even if they lose tomorrow at UConn, they’ll have shots against Providence (A), Seton Hall (A), Creighton (H), and whoever they play in the Big East Tournament. Those are good opportunities.

Seton Hall: Bracket Matrix 11-seed, The Barking Crow NIT unseeded

Oh boy.

Seton Hall is only the fourth team out of our NCAAT Bracketology. Sixth, when you account for bid thieves. They have a good NCAAT Selection Score and a bad NIT Seeding Score in our model. Still, I was most surprised to see this output from our model today. If there’s one readout from our model that I don’t like today, it’s this one. My guess is that Q1A wins are the culprit here.

That said, if Seton Hall does miss the NCAAT field (and they’re close to missing it on Bracket Matrix, with some tough games ahead), they’re liable to slip pretty far through the NIT. Their NET isn’t great, so other Big East teams are likelier to get the automatic bids and the home games that come with them. It currently looks like it’ll be hard for an at-large NIT bid to get a 4-seed. It might be hard to get a 3-seed as well. You may have to either be a 2-seed or play on the road.

Miami (FL): John Templon NIT unseeded, The Barking Crow NIT in the mix

I’m not sure how close John has Rutgers to the cut line, but we have Rutgers only barely out of the NIT, so we’ll focus on Miami here, whom John has as an unseeded at-large bid and we have only 2-in-7 likely to make the NIT. (There’s that 2-in-7 number again.)

It appears John last updated his Current NIT Bracket projection on Wednesday morning, before Miami lost by 29 points at home and saw their kenpom ranking drop 14 places. Still, it’s worth considering the Hurricanes for an at-large bid. They’ve beaten NIT bubble teams Georgia, Kansas State, and UCF, they’ve beaten likely NIT teams Pitt and Virginia Tech (twice), they’ve beaten NCAA Tournament near-lock Clemson, and their only really bad loss was the one against Louisville. They made the NCAA Tournament’s Final Four last season with mostly the same roster. They’re dealing with and have dealt with injuries (I believe only one of their players has played in all 27 of their games). Our model doesn’t consider injuries, but the bottom line is: Miami is a weird team. Keep an eye on them.

**

We’d like to compare our probabilities to Bart Torvik’s on the NCAAT bubble, but we’re going to save that for Monday, because the games are approaching and we have a few more things to get done. Here’s the NIT Bracketology graphic. We’ll plan to update our probabilities again on Sunday and our bracketologies again on Monday.

And last, for archival purposes, the full probabilities from our model today:

TeamConferenceMake NCAA TournamentWin NCAA TournamentMake NITWin NIT
ColoradoPac-1234.0%0.1%65.9%6.2%
SMUAmerican27.9%0.0%71.9%5.5%
CincinnatiBig 1225.5%0.0%74.1%4.6%
St. John’sBig East13.0%0.0%85.2%4.3%
Wake ForestACC71.4%0.6%28.6%4.1%
GonzagaWCC71.4%0.5%28.6%4.1%
VillanovaBig East62.6%0.3%37.4%3.6%
XavierBig East11.0%0.0%80.6%3.4%
Virginia TechACC23.3%0.0%74.6%3.2%
IowaBig Ten18.3%0.0%78.4%3.1%
PittACC4.9%0.0%87.9%2.9%
MarylandBig Ten1.8%0.0%71.0%2.7%
DrakeMissouri Valley49.0%0.1%51.0%2.7%
OregonPac-1216.5%0.0%82.4%2.5%
Indiana StateMissouri Valley64.6%0.1%35.4%2.3%
UtahPac-1253.9%0.1%45.9%2.1%
TexasBig 1276.6%0.3%23.4%1.9%
OklahomaBig 1274.8%0.2%25.3%1.9%
ButlerBig East24.3%0.0%73.8%1.8%
Ohio StateBig Ten1.6%0.0%78.6%1.8%
WashingtonPac-123.7%0.0%75.4%1.7%
TCUBig 1280.8%0.3%19.2%1.5%
James MadisonSun Belt42.5%0.0%57.1%1.5%
Florida AtlanticAmerican82.9%0.3%17.1%1.5%
MinnesotaBig Ten1.7%0.0%73.2%1.5%
NevadaMountain West72.3%0.1%27.7%1.4%
ProvidenceBig East49.2%0.1%50.6%1.4%
Seton HallBig East33.5%0.0%64.1%1.3%
Texas A&MSEC54.6%0.1%45.1%1.3%
PrincetonIvy League40.5%0.0%59.3%1.2%
MississippiSEC39.8%0.0%59.7%1.2%
Boise StateMountain West75.1%0.1%24.9%1.1%
San FranciscoWCC11.6%0.0%56.1%1.0%
Saint Mary’sWCC93.1%0.6%6.9%0.9%
UCFBig 120.3%0.0%50.7%0.9%
LSUSEC1.9%0.0%68.9%0.8%
Kansas StateBig 124.8%0.0%63.1%0.8%
BradleyMissouri Valley18.6%0.0%63.9%0.8%
Michigan StateBig Ten94.7%0.9%5.3%0.8%
SyracuseACC8.1%0.0%83.7%0.8%
RichmondAtlantic 1014.2%0.0%73.4%0.8%
NorthwesternBig Ten79.3%0.1%20.7%0.7%
Grand CanyonWAC74.4%0.0%25.6%0.7%
VirginiaACC62.6%0.0%37.4%0.7%
NC StateACC2.4%0.0%49.9%0.7%
NebraskaBig Ten85.2%0.2%14.8%0.7%
GeorgiaSEC0.8%0.0%49.1%0.6%
Mississippi StateSEC88.0%0.3%12.0%0.6%
MemphisAmerican8.7%0.0%69.9%0.6%
SamfordSoCon42.2%0.0%49.6%0.4%
Florida StateACC2.7%0.0%44.7%0.4%
George MasonAtlantic 106.9%0.0%53.0%0.4%
KentuckySEC96.2%0.8%3.8%0.4%
VCUAtlantic 109.6%0.0%49.4%0.3%
Appalachian StateSun Belt28.7%0.0%51.2%0.3%
Boston CollegeACC0.7%0.0%28.3%0.3%
RutgersBig Ten1.0%0.0%33.4%0.3%
UMassAtlantic 108.2%0.0%28.5%0.3%
North TexasAmerican9.3%0.0%19.2%0.2%
Colorado StateMountain West96.9%0.5%3.1%0.2%
Miami (FL)ACC0.7%0.0%27.7%0.2%
UNLVMountain West8.1%0.0%26.5%0.2%
YaleIvy League31.6%0.0%30.0%0.2%
South CarolinaSEC92.3%0.1%7.7%0.2%
South FloridaAmerican7.8%0.0%36.7%0.2%
New MexicoMountain West98.3%0.5%1.7%0.2%
McNeeseSouthland83.3%0.0%15.2%0.1%
Texas TechBig 1298.4%0.6%1.6%0.1%
St. BonaventureAtlantic 106.2%0.0%21.7%0.1%
CornellIvy League22.7%0.0%27.6%0.1%
Penn StateBig Ten0.5%0.0%6.7%0.1%
ArkansasSEC0.1%0.0%6.6%0.1%
Loyola (IL)Atlantic 107.3%0.0%25.5%0.1%
DuquesneAtlantic 103.6%0.0%16.9%0.1%
UC IrvineBig West56.6%0.0%11.5%0.1%
Louisiana TechConference USA41.9%0.0%2.6%0.0%
FloridaSEC99.4%0.5%0.6%0.0%
Washington StatePac-1299.7%0.5%0.3%0.0%
CharlotteAmerican6.7%0.0%9.1%0.0%
UCLAPac-122.2%0.0%5.7%0.0%
Utah StateMountain West99.2%0.2%0.8%0.0%
IndianaBig Ten0.2%0.0%9.5%0.0%
USCPac-120.6%0.0%1.6%0.0%
Saint Joseph’sAtlantic 102.9%0.0%3.5%0.0%
StanfordPac-121.0%0.0%2.1%0.0%
MissouriSEC0.0%0.0%0.2%0.0%
MichiganBig Ten0.2%0.0%0.1%0.0%
BYUBig 12100.0%1.1%0.1%0.0%
IllinoisBig Ten100.0%2.3%0.0%0.0%
UABAmerican2.7%0.0%3.9%0.0%
AkronMAC40.5%0.0%1.8%0.0%
Oklahoma StateBig 120.1%0.0%1.7%0.0%
DavidsonAtlantic 102.5%0.0%1.2%0.0%
UNC WilmingtonCAA26.5%0.0%0.9%0.0%
VermontAmerica East57.8%0.0%0.6%0.0%
CalPac-120.8%0.0%0.3%0.0%
Santa ClaraWCC3.6%0.0%0.2%0.0%
GeorgetownBig East0.0%0.0%0.2%0.0%
ClemsonACC99.9%0.4%0.1%0.0%
College of CharlestonCAA20.7%0.0%0.1%0.0%
TarletonWAC0.0%0.0%0.1%0.0%
Georgia TechACC0.1%0.0%0.1%0.0%
Southern IllinoisMissouri Valley6.7%0.0%0.1%0.0%
Arizona StatePac-120.4%0.0%0.1%0.0%
ToledoMAC24.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
West VirginiaBig 120.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
DaytonAtlantic 10100.0%0.5%0.0%0.0%
TulaneAmerican1.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%
UNC GreensboroSoCon13.8%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Northern IowaMissouri Valley3.5%0.0%0.0%0.0%
DukeACC100.0%4.1%0.0%0.0%
North CarolinaACC100.0%3.2%0.0%0.0%
HoustonBig 12100.0%18.4%0.0%0.0%
Iowa StateBig 12100.0%3.4%0.0%0.0%
KansasBig 12100.0%1.4%0.0%0.0%
BaylorBig 12100.0%1.7%0.0%0.0%
CreightonBig East100.0%2.7%0.0%0.0%
MarquetteBig East100.0%1.8%0.0%0.0%
UConnBig East100.0%9.5%0.0%0.0%
PurdueBig Ten100.0%13.3%0.0%0.0%
WisconsinBig Ten100.0%0.8%0.0%0.0%
San Diego StateMountain West100.0%0.9%0.0%0.0%
ArizonaPac-12100.0%8.1%0.0%0.0%
AuburnSEC100.0%5.4%0.0%0.0%
TennesseeSEC100.0%5.7%0.0%0.0%
AlabamaSEC100.0%5.7%0.0%0.0%
ColgatePatriot League67.5%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Morehead StateOhio Valley54.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%
MerrimackNEC53.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%
High PointBig South50.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%
South Dakota StateSummit League37.5%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Norfolk StateMEAC32.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Eastern KentuckyASUN31.5%0.0%0.0%0.0%
OaklandHorizon League30.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Central Connecticut StateNEC30.5%0.0%0.0%0.0%
SouthernSWAC30.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Weber StateBig Sky28.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Eastern WashingtonBig Sky26.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Youngstown StateHorizon League24.8%0.0%0.0%0.0%
North DakotaSummit League23.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
North Carolina CentralMEAC22.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
LipscombASUN21.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
LibertyConference USA20.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
FairfieldMAAC19.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
UMass LowellAmerica East18.8%0.0%0.0%0.0%
MontanaBig Sky18.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%
HowardMEAC16.9%0.0%0.0%0.0%
UNC AshevilleBig South16.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%
QuinnipiacMAAC16.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%
IonaMAAC16.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
SeattleWAC16.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Little RockOhio Valley16.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Long Beach StateBig West15.8%0.0%0.0%0.0%
UT MartinOhio Valley15.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Western KentuckyConference USA15.5%0.0%0.0%0.0%
DrexelCAA15.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Texas SouthernSWAC15.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
StetsonASUN14.8%0.0%0.0%0.0%
ChattanoogaSoCon14.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%
HofstraCAA14.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
BryantAmerica East13.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Wright StateHorizon League13.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
MaristMAAC13.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Grambling StateSWAC13.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Jackson StateSWAC12.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Northern ColoradoBig Sky12.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Western CarolinaSoCon12.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
South Carolina StateMEAC11.9%0.0%0.0%0.0%
OhioMAC11.9%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Delaware StateMEAC11.9%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Austin PeayASUN11.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%
North FloridaASUN11.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%
WinthropBig South11.5%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Saint Peter’sMAAC11.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Alcorn StateSWAC10.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Green BayHorizon League10.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Sam Houston StateConference USA10.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
UC DavisBig West10.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
TowsonCAA9.9%0.0%0.0%0.0%
North Dakota StateSummit League9.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%
FurmanSoCon9.5%0.0%0.0%0.0%
TroySun Belt9.5%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Kent StateMAC9.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
NiagaraMAAC9.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%
LouisianaSun Belt9.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
LehighPatriot League8.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Kansas CitySummit League8.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Texas A&M-Corpus ChristiSouthland8.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Alabama StateSWAC8.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Sacred HeartNEC8.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
OmahaSummit League8.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Western IllinoisOhio Valley7.9%0.0%0.0%0.0%
LafayettePatriot League7.9%0.0%0.0%0.0%
DenverSummit League7.5%0.0%0.0%0.0%
LongwoodBig South7.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%
DelawareCAA7.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Northern KentuckyHorizon League6.9%0.0%0.0%0.0%
HawaiiBig West6.9%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Mount St. Mary’sMAAC6.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Gardner-WebbBig South6.5%0.0%0.0%0.0%
AmericanPatriot League6.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Jacksonville StateConference USA6.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Purdue Fort WayneHorizon League5.9%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Arkansas StateSun Belt5.8%0.0%0.0%0.0%
RiderMAAC5.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%
UT ArlingtonWAC5.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Bethune-CookmanSWAC5.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%
New HampshireAmerica East5.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Portland StateBig Sky5.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Cleveland StateHorizon League5.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Oral RobertsSummit League5.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
UC Santa BarbaraBig West5.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
LamarSouthland5.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Central MichiganMAC4.8%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Boston UniversityPatriot League4.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%
North AlabamaASUN4.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
WagnerNEC4.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Montana StateBig Sky4.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Bowling Green StateMAC4.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
RadfordBig South3.8%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Utah ValleyWAC3.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%
UTEPConference USA3.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%
BucknellPatriot League3.5%0.0%0.0%0.0%
ColumbiaIvy League3.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
WoffordSoCon3.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Morgan StateMEAC3.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Stephen F. AustinWAC3.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Idaho StateBig Sky3.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
MonmouthCAA2.9%0.0%0.0%0.0%
SIU EdwardsvilleOhio Valley2.9%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Miami (OH)MAC2.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%
BelmontMissouri Valley2.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Murray StateMissouri Valley2.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Tennessee StateOhio Valley2.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Fairleigh DickinsonNEC2.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Kennesaw StateASUN2.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
MilwaukeeHorizon League2.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
East Tennessee StateSoCon2.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
MaineAmerica East2.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%
HarvardIvy League2.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%
UC RiversideBig West2.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%
CanisiusMAAC2.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Stony BrookCAA2.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Alabama A&MSWAC2.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
California BaptistWAC2.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
PresbyterianBig South2.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Cal State NorthridgeBig West1.9%0.0%0.0%0.0%
NichollsSouthland1.8%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Maryland Eastern ShoreMEAC1.8%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Prairie View A&MSWAC1.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Florida Gulf CoastASUN1.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Arkansas-Pine BluffSWAC1.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Ball StateMAC1.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
MercerSoCon1.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Georgia StateSun Belt1.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Southeastern LouisianaSouthland1.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Northern ArizonaBig Sky1.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
NortheasternCAA1.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Cal State FullertonBig West1.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
New Mexico StateConference USA1.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
South AlabamaSun Belt1.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Missouri StateMissouri Valley1.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
AlbanyAmerica East1.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
East CarolinaAmerican0.9%0.0%0.0%0.0%
FIUConference USA0.9%0.0%0.0%0.0%
USC UpstateBig South0.9%0.0%0.0%0.0%
LIUNEC0.9%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Western MichiganMAC0.9%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Middle TennesseeConference USA0.8%0.0%0.0%0.0%
BinghamtonAmerica East0.8%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Illinois StateMissouri Valley0.8%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Eastern IllinoisOhio Valley0.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%
South DakotaSummit League0.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Southern MissSun Belt0.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%
NavyPatriot League0.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%
MarshallSun Belt0.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%
The CitadelSoCon0.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%
IdahoBig Sky0.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Charleston SouthernBig South0.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Wichita StateAmerican0.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%
ArmyPatriot League0.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%
JacksonvilleASUN0.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Texas StateSun Belt0.5%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Saint FrancisNEC0.5%0.0%0.0%0.0%
UMBCAmerica East0.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
EvansvilleMissouri Valley0.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Cal State BakersfieldBig West0.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Coppin StateMEAC0.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Abilene ChristianWAC0.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
RiceAmerican0.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%
BrownIvy League0.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%
UICMissouri Valley0.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%
TulsaAmerican0.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Robert MorrisHorizon League0.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
CampbellCAA0.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Loyola (MD)Patriot League0.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Northwestern StateSouthland0.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
FordhamAtlantic 100.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
ManhattanMAAC0.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
ElonCAA0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Rhode IslandAtlantic 100.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Holy CrossPatriot League0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Loyola MarymountWCC0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Old DominionSun Belt0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Louisiana MonroeSun Belt0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
WyomingMountain West0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
San DiegoWCC0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Sacramento StateBig Sky0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Georgia SouthernSun Belt0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Notre DameACC0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
TempleAmerican0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
George WashingtonAtlantic 100.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
PepperdineWCC0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
La SalleAtlantic 100.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Central ArkansasASUN0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
PennIvy League0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Tennessee TechOhio Valley0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Southern UtahWAC0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0%
NJITAmerica East0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Saint LouisAtlantic 100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Fresno StateMountain West0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
William & MaryCAA0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Air ForceMountain West0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
StonehillNEC0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Oregon StatePac-120.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Incarnate WordSouthland0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
ValparaisoMissouri Valley0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
VMISoCon0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Houston ChristianSouthland0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Coastal CarolinaSun Belt0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
LouisvilleACC0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
UTSAAmerican0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
HamptonCAA0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
SienaMAAC0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
PortlandWCC0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
BellarmineASUN0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
QueensASUN0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
DePaulBig East0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
UC San DiegoBig West0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Cal PolyBig West0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
North Carolina A&TCAA0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
IUPUIHorizon League0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Detroit MercyHorizon League0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Chicago StateIndependent0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
DartmouthIvy League0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
BuffaloMAC0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Eastern MichiganMAC0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Northern IllinoisMAC0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
San Jose StateMountain West0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Le MoyneNEC0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
LindenwoodOhio Valley0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Southern IndianaOhio Valley0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Southeast Missouri StateOhio Valley0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
VanderbiltSEC0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
New OrleansSouthland0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Texas A&M-CommerceSouthland0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
St. ThomasSummit League0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Florida A&MSWAC0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Mississippi Valley StateSWAC0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Utah TechWAC0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
UT Rio Grande ValleyWAC0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
PacificWCC0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
The Barking Crow's resident numbers man. Was asked to do NIT Bracketology in 2018 and never looked back. Fields inquiries on Twitter: @joestunardi.
Posts created 3304

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.